![proxima nova font not showing up adobe proxima nova font not showing up adobe](https://miro.medium.com/max/2400/1*4xaoreUrPVbnhBKJ63StDQ.png)
They're not identical, but do you really need identical just to build the page? With responsive/liquid design, there's already an expectation that lines of text are going to reflow based on the viewport size, so if one font is a bit wider or narrower than the other, does it really matter? I realize it won't be "pixel-perfect" inside BSS, but you're already dealing with similar challenges just going from one browser to another. BSS is way too good of a program to write off over fonts, say, Google Font's Montserrat for Proxima Nova would provide a similar look & feel to the page in BSS. Is your team really that married to fonts exclusive to Adobe, or can you perhaps use fonts that are similar in appearance on Google? Personally, my clients couldn't care less what fonts I choose for their sites, as long as their sites generate business for them. Also worth noting, and this is actually more relevant, is that Adobe delivers its fonts with a script placed in the head area, which can slow down your site's loading speed, and slow = bad for SEO and UX. It's worth noting that some fonts available on Adobe fonts are the same as those on Google fonts. Their attitude will be something along the lines of, "well then buy a Creative Cloud subscription and use our (steaming pile of crap) Dreamweaver program to build your sites."
![proxima nova font not showing up adobe proxima nova font not showing up adobe](https://blog.typekit.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/110818-proxima-hinted1.png)
Adobe doesn't do much in terms of "sharing" their proprietary products. I wouldn't hold my breath hoping for Adobe Webfont support in BSS. When BSS 4.5x was announced, the devs said that custom font import would be coming in a future 4.5x release, so hopefully not too much longer.